Sections
Archive
| Mo | Tu | We | Th | Fr | Sa | Su | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | ||||
| 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | |
| 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | |
| 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | |
| 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | ||
Newsletter
Did you enjoy this article?
Stalemate in Turkmenistan-Iran Gas Row
nCa News and Commentary
Ashgabat, 13 January 2008 (nCa) --- A press release issued Saturday by the foreign office of Turkmenistan shows that the deadlock in Turkmen gas supplies to Iran may continue until Iran returns back to the negotiation table and honour its commitments about payments.
Turkmenistan stopped supplying natural gas to Iran at the beginning of this month. At that time the Turkmen government explained that the supplies were halted due to repair and maintenance works in the supply network.
The press release of Saturday sheds some more light on the issue.
“The Turkmen side had reported earlier that gas supplies to Iran were suspended due to technical problems related to the need to conduct preventive repair of the gas pipeline,” says the press release.
It adds, “Such preventive repair is conducted in accordance with recognized technical norms and standards and takes some time. At the same time, the completion of preventive repair also depends on the issue of funding.”
The press release underlines, “In this regard, it is important to emphasize that the Iranian side's failure to honour its obligations related to payment of gas supplied earlier from Turkmenistan holds in the timely completion of preventive repair.”
nCa Commentary
Brinkmanship features prominently in Iranian policies. Usually it pays off but sometimes it backfires, as it did in its gas negotiations with Turkmenistan.
The standard procedure is that under the terms of the supply agreements with its buyers, Turkmenistan starts renegotiating gas prices in the middle of the year for next year’s volumes.
However, Iran is typically reluctant to enter the process till very late.
This time it should have been a fairly simple process: Turkmenistan had already informed that henceforth it would charge equal price from all the buyers.
In 2007, Iran paid US $ 75 per 1000 cubic meters for Turkmen gas. It was a special, one-time concession for Iran.
Turkmenistan proposed that price for 2008 should be around US $ 140 per thousand cubic meters, bringing it at par with what Russia is paying.
For whatever reason, Iran ignored the notice and sent a mid-level delegation that was probably not sufficiently empowered to negotiate.
Two things are at display in Iranian stand: 1. Disunity in official stance; and 2. Lack of foresight.
While the Iranian Oil Minister Gholamhossein Nozari said Sunday that he would not consider further negotiations with Turkmenistan and would even stop buying gas from Turkmenistan altogether unless supplies were resumed immediately, the foreign ministry of Iran said that Iran would be willing to pay US $ 140 per thousand cubic meters if Turkmenistan agreed to increase the export volumes.
This shows absence of coordination among ministries over an issue of vital importance.
The fact that President Ahmedinejad had to make an unscheduled visit to the areas hit by the shortage of gas demonstrates that he was equally unprepared for the way his oil ministry handled the matter.
The lack of foresight that led to the whole mess is enormous:
1. Knowing that failed negotiations may result in termination of gas supplies from Turkmenistan, did the oil ministry make alternate arrangements to meet the winter demands of the consumers, especially when they knew that a long spell of extreme cold was about to grip the region?
2. Was any consideration given to the fact that the absence of Turkmen volumes would cause collapse of Iranian supplies to Turkey? This question is very significant because Iran is trying to market itself as important supplier and transit country for gas supplies to Europe.
Iran stopped supplying gas to Turkey and Turkey was forced to halt supplies to Greece.
Now it would be difficult for Iran to prove that it is a reliable energy partner, both as a supplier and transit country.
Post your comment
Comments (3 posted)
-
Posted by s,a, hassan, 18 January, 2008 17:02:08Posted by s.a.hassan, 16 January, 2008 20:12:15 Referring to the commentary, as a friend and visitor of your website, I wanted to mention the following subjects: As you have referred to the press release of M.F.A. of Turkmenistan, it was better you would wait & evaluate in your report, based on the official response of Iranian side also. Afterwards I wanted to ask, not to interrelate the subjects with each other, for example to be a supplier & transit country for gas , does not relate to a situation which is basically beyond the context of the bilateral contract ( BETWEEN I.R.IRAN and TURKMENISTAN) factors such as technical difficulties and weather in which is so intense cold that haven’t been during 3 decades ago and cutting off the gas was a sign was like what happened to countries in the region in Januaries in previous years . Besides, I predict that both sides will go forward, because regionally thinking the two countries are supplier of gas to neighboring countries & Europe and both are at one stance. Besides that, both are obliged to follow their contracts. Although we are not about to evaluate the relation of two countries based on an event, but it must be mentioned that neighborly relation which is considered in many documents between the two countries such as Friendship... Treaty is prominent and based on the will of the rulers of two countries, and as a Turkmen proverb says ; neighbors will rescue each other even in resurrection, something which we had an example of it before (during the rule of president Rafsanjai ). The last point which must be mentioned is that the rulers of Iran must also find suitable solution for their difficulties in northern part of Islamic Republic of Iran .
-
Posted by s.a. hassan, 18 January, 2008 17:02:08Referring to the commentary, as a friend and visitor of your website, I wanted to mention the following subjects: As you have referred to the press release of M.F.A. of Turkmenistan, it was better you would wait & evaluate in your report, based on the official response of Iranian side also. Afterwards I wanted to ask, not to interrelate the subjects with each other, for example to be a supplier & transit country for gas , does not relate to a situation which is basically beyond the context of the bilateral contract ( BETWEEN I.R.IRAN and TURKMENISTAN) factors such as technical difficulties and weather in which is so intense cold that haven’t been during 3 decades ago and cutting off the gas was a sign was like what happened to countries in the region in Januaries in previous years . Besides, I predict that both sides will go forward, because regionally thinking the two countries are supplier of gas to neighboring countries & Europe and both are at one stance. Besides that, both are obliged to follow their contracts. Although we are not about to evaluate the relation of two countries based on an event, but it must be mentioned that neighborly relation which is considered in many documents between the two countries such as Friendship... Treaty is prominent and based on the will of the rulers of two countries, and as a Turkmen proverb says ; neighbors will rescue each other even in resurrection, something which we had an example of it before (during the rule of president Rafsanjai ). The last point which must be mentioned is that the rulers of Iran must also find suitable solution for their difficulties in northern part of Islamic Republic of Iran .
-
Posted by s.a.hassan, 18 January, 2008 17:02:08Referring to the commentary, as a friend and visitor of your website, I wanted to mention the following subjects: As you have referred to the press release of M.F.A. of Turkmenistan, it was better you would wait & evaluate in your report, based on the official response of Iranian side also. Afterwards I wanted to ask, not to interrelate the subjects with each other, for example to be a supplier & transit country for gas , does not relate to a situation which is basically beyond the context of the bilateral contract ( BETWEEN I.R.IRAN and TURKMENISTAN) factors such as technical difficulties and weather in which is so intense cold that haven’t been during 3 decades ago and cutting off the gas was a sign was like what happened to countries in the region in Januaries in previous years . Besides, I predict that both sides will go forward, because regionally thinking the two countries are supplier of gas to neighboring countries & Europe and both are at one stance. Besides that, both are obliged to follow their contracts. Although we are not about to evaluate the relation of two countries based on an event, but it must be mentioned that neighborly relation which is considered in many documents between the two countries such as Friendship... Treaty is prominent and based on the will of the rulers of two countries, and as a Turkmen proverb says ; neighbors will rescue each other even in resurrection, something which we had an example of it before (during the rule of president Rafsanjai ). The last point which must be mentioned is that the rulers of Iran must also find suitable solution for their difficulties in northern part of Islamic Republic of Iran .








